NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

RE: OFV from different algorithms

From: Bauer, Robert <Robert.Bauer>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:13:27 +0000

It seems there have been two different questions posed on the same subject line. I will deal with each one separately.

1) The original question from Mark Tepeck has been answered by Leonid Gibiansky, that generally when covariate model comparisons are performed, the OFV from the same estimation algorithm should be used (Imp with IMP, FOCEI with FOCEI, etc.)
2) The question about how the absorption-two compartment model modeled in ADVAN6 (or the other ODE ADVANs) compares to the in-line analytical ADVAN4 version, can be answered as follows: If the models built using ADVAN4 and ADVAN6 are identical in every way with respect to the user's setup (residual variance, OMEGA layout lag times, bioavailability, etc.), then the OFV between these two should be very close, within less than one OFV. The difference between finite difference evaluation of derivatives versus analytical derivatives, should not cause a difference of more than that. There may be exceptions to this if a model is quite complex with potential numerical issues. Dennis's particular experience of a difference of 60 units suggests that the models were not set up identically in ADVN4 versus ADVAN6. I believe Luann Philipps in her response was addressing this possibility. By the way, many modelers favor ADVAN13 as the go-to ODE solver.

Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Senior Director
Pharmacometrics R&D
ICON Early Phase
820 W. Diamond Avenue
Suite 100
Gaithersburg, MD 20878
Office: (215) 616-6428
Mobile: (925) 286-0769
<br /><br />
ICON plc made the following annotations.
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that ICON plc can arrange for proper delivery, and then please delete the message.

Thank You,

ICON plc
South County Business Park
Dublin 18
Registered number: 145835

Received on Thu Sep 24 2020 - 12:13:27 EDT

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to:

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: